<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Feeling Bitacle</title> <atom:link href="http://twopointouch.com/2006/09/22/bitacle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://twopointouch.com/2006/stuff/bitacle/</link> <description>web 2.0, blogs and social media</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 20:58:01 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator> <item><title>By: Billy The Blogging Poet</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2006/stuff/bitacle/#comment-506</link> <dc:creator>Billy The Blogging Poet</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2006 03:06:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2006/09/22/bitacle/#comment-506</guid> <description>Ian,
Rather than repeat myself on a hundred different blogs I updated my post where you left your comments with links to a way to deal with scrapers I&#039;ve used successfully many times. That said: unless you set your RSS feeds to short you are doomed to repeat this same thing on a pretty regular basis-- like it or not.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian,<br
/> Rather than repeat myself on a hundred different blogs I updated my post where you left your comments with links to a way to deal with scrapers I’ve used successfully many times. That said: unless you set your RSS feeds to short you are doomed to repeat this same thing on a pretty regular basis– like it or not.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ian Delaney</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2006/stuff/bitacle/#comment-502</link> <dc:creator>Ian Delaney</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 22:22:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2006/09/22/bitacle/#comment-502</guid> <description>As I said, it breaches the Creative Commons license I have put on this site. So, yes, I do have a problem.
Any idea how to proceed?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I said, it breaches the Creative Commons license I have put on this site. So, yes, I do have a problem.</p><p>Any idea how to proceed?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Amy Gahran</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2006/stuff/bitacle/#comment-501</link> <dc:creator>Amy Gahran</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 22:15:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2006/09/22/bitacle/#comment-501</guid> <description>&quot;the advertising networks ought to be thinking a lot more about the value they are delivering to both publishers and advertisers.&quot;
Google and Yahoo especially should be mindful of how their encouragement of splogs directly undermines the usefulness of their own search engines.
Also, I guess if you&#039;re getting a link back from a splog and that makes you happy, then that&#039;s your business. Personally, Id have a problem with that, but to each their own.
- Amy Gahran</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“the advertising networks ought to be thinking a lot more about the value they are delivering to both publishers and advertisers.”</p><p>Google and Yahoo especially should be mindful of how their encouragement of splogs directly undermines the usefulness of their own search engines.</p><p>Also, I guess if you’re getting a link back from a splog and that makes you happy, then that’s your business. Personally, Id have a problem with that, but to each their own.</p><p>- Amy Gahran</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ian Delaney</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2006/stuff/bitacle/#comment-500</link> <dc:creator>Ian Delaney</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 22:02:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2006/09/22/bitacle/#comment-500</guid> <description>Thanks for the great information.
It&#039;s where we draw the line between aggregators and splogs, I guess  - I publish a full text feed because I think it&#039;s the right thing to do. But I don&#039;t want someone else to make money out of my content without my permission. The CC license is there for a reason. It&#039;s also on my feed via feedburner.
Good point that the advertising networks ought to be thinking a lot more about the value they are delivering to both publishers and advertisers.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the great information.</p><p>It’s where we draw the line between aggregators and splogs, I guess  — I publish a full text feed because I think it’s the right thing to do. But I don’t want someone else to make money out of my content without my permission. The CC license is there for a reason. It’s also on my feed via feedburner.</p><p>Good point that the advertising networks ought to be thinking a lot more about the value they are delivering to both publishers and advertisers.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Amy Gahran</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2006/stuff/bitacle/#comment-499</link> <dc:creator>Amy Gahran</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 21:32:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2006/09/22/bitacle/#comment-499</guid> <description>Hi, Ian
Yeah, this Bitacle splog has received a lot of attention lately. although, as far as I can tell, it&#039;s just another splog -- maybe more sophisticated and ambitious in terms of whose content, and how much content, it steals -- but otherwise, just another splog.
The more I think over this splogger problem, the more I think it&#039;s futile and even counterproductive to try to hunt down and shut down individual sploggers.
They&#039;re not the real problem. They&#039;re just opportunists. The REAL problem is that Google, Yahoo, and other online ad network providers have their programs set up in such a way that actively *encourages* sploggers.
It does no good to stamp out a few cockroaches. You have to stop them from breeding.
I just wrote more about this at Contentious: http://tinyurl.com/rvp7t
Thanks!
- Amy Gahran</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Ian</p><p>Yeah, this Bitacle splog has received a lot of attention lately. although, as far as I can tell, it’s just another splog — maybe more sophisticated and ambitious in terms of whose content, and how much content, it steals — but otherwise, just another splog.</p><p>The more I think over this splogger problem, the more I think it’s futile and even counterproductive to try to hunt down and shut down individual sploggers.</p><p>They’re not the real problem. They’re just opportunists. The REAL problem is that Google, Yahoo, and other online ad network providers have their programs set up in such a way that actively *encourages* sploggers.</p><p>It does no good to stamp out a few cockroaches. You have to stop them from breeding.</p><p>I just wrote more about this at Contentious: <a
href="http://tinyurl.com/rvp7t" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/rvp7t</a></p><p>Thanks!</p><p>- Amy Gahran</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
