Bebo Looks For Revenue 2.0

An inter­view in the Sunday Times yes­terday said that Bebo head Michael Birch seemed prepared to wait before earning much money from the service:

Birch, 36, is almost dis­missive of the need for Bebo to generate revenues at this stage. For the next two or three years, his priority is to estab­lish the firm as one of the global leaders in social net­working. The big chal­lenge is in America, where Bebo is cur­rently a distant third behind MySpace and Facebook, a college-​​based site.

“At the moment there’s a race for traffic,” says Birch. “Implementing a suc­cessful business model does not neces­sarily help in that goal. There are so many avenues that social net­working can go down.”

So Friday’s rev­el­a­tion that Bebo is planning a mobile service isn’t about revenue? Pete Cashmore notes:

…it seems that Bebo Mobile is a step closer — mobile phone group O2 is in talks with the company, although dis­cus­sions are still at the early stages. There were rumors earlier this week that Bebo plans to extend the site via SMS, rather than the WAP-​​based services that other social networks are pursuing.

As Pete says, SMS mes­saging is extremely popular here in the UK, far more so than WAP or Mobile Web, where Bebo is also the number one social network. It’s also a tech­no­logy that’s already been well integ­rated with other youth media such as voting on Big Brother or Pop Idol.

Teaming with one or more of the mobile oper­ators to share revenues from mob­log­ging, update messages, photo, ring­tones and video services seems like a win-​​win for both the oper­ators and the social network.

It may seem ironic that Web 2.0 social networks may ulti­mately find one of their best revenue streams from working with a com­pletely dif­ferent area of the tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions industry. But if brand advert­isers are not yet ready to pay high rates for what is per­ceived as low quality social network traffic, and the users them­selves are res­istant to advert­ising, then it’s cer­tainly time to move sideways.

This seems part of a wider strategy to look at non-​​orthodox sources of revenue. Jim Scheinman, the Bebo’s VP of business devel­op­ment and sales told e-​​consultancy some­thing pretty similar in regard to Bebo TV. They’re working towards some­thing called ‘Engagement Marketing’, which seems like a good move under current circumstances:

Web 1.0 advert­ising is dead. If you look at Yahoo’s last quarterly numbers they’ve seen a decrease in graph­ical advert­ising when in fact online advert­ising has gone up. It’s not that people aren’t buying banners any more, it’s that they’re not core any more.

Birch himself spoke out in August about tra­di­tional media buyers not really ‘getting’ social media. Bebo cer­tainly does care about revenue, though. It just isn’t the revenues you might ini­tially imagine that it is chasing. Let’s hope it can move to the point where it can ignore those not agile enough to keep up.

Share this post:

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Possibly related:

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>