A Win for Wikis

A new report says Wikis are more important than social networks when it comes to business tech­no­logy buyers. The report, from Knowledge Storm and Universal McCann, is avail­able here — regis­tra­tion required. It’s also a cut-​​and-​​paste pro­tected PDF, the devil’s own file format.

But basic­ally, it says that, of 5300 participants:

77% of these buyers have little or no exper­i­ence of with social networks. The report suggests that these people are still using the web to “get” inform­a­tion and that the “giving back” part of social net­working might make them uncomfortable.

On the other hand, 86% of respond­ents said they were familiar with wikis, and more than 50% are weekly wiki visitors. 52% stated that wikis influ­enced their pur­chasing decisions.

graph

Interestingly, the only wiki men­tioned in the report as an example was Wikipedia, high­lighting that the import­ance and influ­ence of the online encyc­lo­paedia goes far beyond its apparent status as a neutral ref­er­ence tool. While it (thank­fully) doesn’t carry product reviews, one can only presume that articles covering com­peting tech­no­lo­gies and IT strategies are extremely influential.

Two recent social networks have been launched spe­cific­ally for techies: Aggreg8 from Microsoft and, closer to home, the new ZDNet.co.uk com­munities endeavour. Would it have been a better idea to produce wiki-​​inspired features instead? Well, maybe, except, like most of us, IT buyers are most likely to be passive rather than active users: only 6% said they reg­u­larly con­trib­uted to wikis.

Share this post:

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Possibly related:

3 comments to A Win for Wikis

  • I like the dis­tinc­tion you make between social networks and wikis. Wikis are not neces­sarily “social,” however, some really are. Wikipedia appeals to a lot of people, IMO, because it acts, in many ways, like the old Web 1.0 to a lot of late adapters in that they go there for inform­a­tion only; not to actually add their input.

    It’s Janusian nature also allows others to par­ti­cipate “socially.”

  • Well, to be fair, it was the report that drew the dif­fer­ence — though you’re right that wikis aren’t neces­sarily social — a nice dis­tinc­tion in this context.

  • […] A win for Wikis November 20th, 2006 Filed under frogpond A new report says Wikis are more important than social networks when it comes to business tech­no­logy buyers. Posted by mk @ 10:28 am […]

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>