“Story rankings play havoc with traditional journalistic tenets” apparently. In his Dow Jones MarketWatch ‘Ethics Watch’ column, Thomas Kostigen says that digg-style news-voting systems are messing with his mind, continually tempting him to write popular stories.
It emerges, however, that actually it’s not digg that is directly responsible, that’s just a trendy hook for the story. It’s being on the Internet as opposed to a (paper) newspaper. Statistics packages can provide some pretty harsh feedback for news writers that you’d never get for filing unpopular stories back in olden times. They can also supply golden information on the types of story that ‘work’. But does this ability to supply stuff people actually want to read mean that journalists aren’t doing their duty by covering the unpopular truth that no-one wants to hear?
The job of a journalist is to lobby and report stories that he or she covers, or better yet, uncovers. In this way, the story is forced upon readers. At a newspaper that’s more easily done because an editor can’t point directly to a story’s ranking and say, “Look son, no one wants to read about that. Go cover something else.” But now he or she can.
This ability to judge popularity is normally viewed as a good thing, of course. If your readership’s engagement with stories can be measured then you can find out what your audience wants and do more of it. You can discover that nobody likes this or that topic and drop it.
But does this threaten to put a stop to investigative journalism that doesn’t suit a hedonistic, irresponsible public, as Kostigen says? Well, top of digg right now is a story about a man who was tasered, clubbed and committed by the police as a result of his epilepsy. In fact, pretty much all the top ‘world and business’ stories at the moment are about political scandals, anti-war, and anti-establishment news stories. If you use digg as the barometer of what the public really wants, then the front page of MarketWatch might look a bit different.























[…] twopointouch: Evil of Digg Overestimated at Marketwatch’s Thomas Kostigen worries that the availability of statistics — and social news aggregators like Digg — are tempting him into journlistic populism. Is this really a problem? (tags: ethics statistics journalism digg) […]
[…] twopointouch: Evil of Digg Overestimated at Marketwatch’s Thomas Kostigen worries that the availability of statistics — and social news aggregators like Digg — are tempting him into journlistic populism. Is this really a problem? (tags: ethics statistics journalism digg) […]