The UK Home Office’s Child Protection Task Force has produced a draft industry discussion document called Good Practice Guidance for Social Networking and User Interactive Service. What you and I would probably call Web 2.0. Once finished and public, the document will seemingly supplant the existing guidelines in the report (PDF) published last year on Good practice guidance for the moderation of interactive services for children.
It’s fairly weighty and brings together a wealth of research from sociologists, child psychiatrists and internet researchers. It’s also a well-informed and mature discussion. The members of the task force are industry insiders and child development experts. While the dangers that can visit children via the Internet are fully acknowledged, the positive elements of social networks are also explored, citing evidence that teens use virtual experiences for self expression and to safely test and experiment with their own sexuality, for example. It also recognises that those who end up in trouble often do so as a willed act and are more likely to be vulnerable in the first place. The Internet and social networks aren’t viewed as necessarily corrupting but as a neutral tool that needs good, safety-oriented design and sensible instructions for use if accidents are to be avoided.
There are more encouraging words in the Guidelines for Parents on the need to strike a balance when it comes to trying to ensure their children’s safety online:
- Children and young people have strong views about their privacy and it will be important for you to help your child to use social networking sites responsibly and safely.
- There is an important balance between educating children and young people about the risks online, viewing what they are doing and actually trusting them in their use of social networking sites, and allowing them a degree of autonomy.
Rather than bans and restrictions for users, the onus is placed upon the owners and publishers of social networks to ensure safety when it comes to the design of their networks and the ways in which children can and can’t interract with each other and with adults. Specific guidelines are given on the amount of personal information that is collected and exposed, the removal of search for material from children under 18, content screening and moderation, and easy mechanisms for instigating complaints.
Providing that the politicians aren’t allowed too close to this discussion and attempt to use the debate to drum up support in Conservative Middle England, it seems possible that we’ll be able to avoid something as counter-productive and ignorant as the US DOPA legislation.






















Recent Comments