<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Where is Digi Joe Public?</title> <atom:link href="http://twopointouch.com/2006/blogs/where-is-digi-joe-public/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://twopointouch.com/2006/blogs/where-is-digi-joe-public/</link> <description>web 2.0, blogs and social media</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 20:58:01 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator> <item><title>By: Ian Delaney</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2006/blogs/where-is-digi-joe-public/#comment-906</link> <dc:creator>Ian Delaney</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 23:59:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2006/10/16/where-is-digi-joe-public/#comment-906</guid> <description>Bob - I reckon &lt;i&gt;Deja Joe Public&lt;/i&gt; could catch on as the next &#039;hot demographic&#039;!
You&#039;re all probably quite right, except the report did say &#039;blog or web site&#039;, as far as I can tell. That&#039;s what the Guardian said. I won&#039;t be spending Â£3K or whatever, to find out the finer details. Sorry.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob — I reckon <i>Deja Joe Public</i> could catch on as the next ‘hot demographic’!</p><p>You’re all probably quite right, except the report did say ‘blog or web site’, as far as I can tell. That’s what the Guardian said. I won’t be spending Â£3K or whatever, to find out the finer details. Sorry.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bob Boydston</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2006/blogs/where-is-digi-joe-public/#comment-904</link> <dc:creator>Bob Boydston</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 22:38:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2006/10/16/where-is-digi-joe-public/#comment-904</guid> <description>The first time I saw the title to this riff I thought it said, &quot;Where is Deja vu Joe Public?&quot; (But maybe it was just too much wine.)
But, after reading it I think Deja vu is right on.  How many times have we seen where pollsters are just asking the wrong questions to the wrong people? E.g., blog is a &quot;technical&quot; term and it can misunderstood by those who don&#039;t really care what you call it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first time I saw the title to this riff I thought it said, “Where is Deja vu Joe Public?” (But maybe it was just too much wine.)</p><p>But, after reading it I think Deja vu is right on.  How many times have we seen where pollsters are just asking the wrong questions to the wrong people? E.g., blog is a “technical” term and it can misunderstood by those who don’t really care what you call it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Simon Wakeman</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2006/blogs/where-is-digi-joe-public/#comment-903</link> <dc:creator>Simon Wakeman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 21:41:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2006/10/16/where-is-digi-joe-public/#comment-903</guid> <description>David&#039;s absolutely right - the problem with these types of market research is that often the language used is why the results feel wrong.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David’s absolutely right — the problem with these types of market research is that often the language used is why the results feel wrong.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Cruickshank</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2006/blogs/where-is-digi-joe-public/#comment-896</link> <dc:creator>David Cruickshank</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 16:57:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2006/10/16/where-is-digi-joe-public/#comment-896</guid> <description>I agree with you Ian but the problem with the tech world is the language.  If I asked my &#039;non-media&#039; friends they would say the same as yours.  However, I suspect that the fact that they don&#039;t know what a blog is doesn&#039;t mean they haven&#039;t ever read one.
You see, to my sister, my Mum and my best mate &#039;a blog&#039; has no meaning.  But they know what a website is and a blog fits that description precisely.  I&#039;d go as far as to suggest that the vast majority of &#039;blog readers&#039; don&#039;t know what a blog is - but they still visit and read the stuff we write.  They just don&#039;t care what the wrapper&#039;s called.  Kinda makes sense if you think about it.  Why call it a blog when it could still be a website?  Why call it RSS when we could use &#039;website feed&#039;?  Why call it &#039;content management system&#039; when it could be &#039;website editor&#039;?  I guess it&#039;s because the inventors / innovators have to market these things as something new to catch the early adopters&#039; attention - and the early adopters LOVE learning new geeky terms.  Smartphone - I mean c&#039;mon!  Mobile still works for me!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you Ian but the problem with the tech world is the language.  If I asked my ‘non-media’ friends they would say the same as yours.  However, I suspect that the fact that they don’t know what a blog is doesn’t mean they haven’t ever read one.</p><p>You see, to my sister, my Mum and my best mate ‘a blog’ has no meaning.  But they know what a website is and a blog fits that description precisely.  I’d go as far as to suggest that the vast majority of ‘blog readers’ don’t know what a blog is — but they still visit and read the stuff we write.  They just don’t care what the wrapper’s called.  Kinda makes sense if you think about it.  Why call it a blog when it could still be a website?  Why call it RSS when we could use ‘website feed’?  Why call it ‘content management system’ when it could be ‘website editor’?  I guess it’s because the inventors / innovators have to market these things as something new to catch the early adopters’ attention — and the early adopters LOVE learning new geeky terms.  Smartphone — I mean c’mon!  Mobile still works for me!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ian Delaney</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2006/blogs/where-is-digi-joe-public/#comment-892</link> <dc:creator>Ian Delaney</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 09:52:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2006/10/16/where-is-digi-joe-public/#comment-892</guid> <description>I meant HYPOTHETICALLY!
..damn</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant HYPOTHETICALLY!</p><p>..damn</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Drew B</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2006/blogs/where-is-digi-joe-public/#comment-891</link> <dc:creator>Drew B</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 09:41:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2006/10/16/where-is-digi-joe-public/#comment-891</guid> <description>â€œI really enjoy a good session of D&amp;Dâ€
Lol :-)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>â€œI really enjoy a good session of D&amp;Dâ€</p><p>Lol :-)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
