Comments on: 5 power laws in Web 2.0 http://twopointouch.com/2006/business/5-power-laws-in-web-20/ web 2.0, blogs and social media Mon, 30 May 2011 20:58:01 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3 By: Bob Stumpelhttp://twopointouch.com/2006/business/5-power-laws-in-web-20/#comment-325 Bob Stumpel Sat, 26 Aug 2006 22:14:52 +0000 http://twopointouch.com/2006/08/07/5-power-laws-in-web-20/#comment-325 Hi, The Sacred Cowdung list you quoted in the article above in fact is a very early version of the list that I maintain on my EVERYTHING 2.0 blog - http://bobstumpel.blogspot.com. It has been substantially extended. Brgrds, BOB Hi,

The Sacred Cowdung list you quoted in the article above in fact is a very early version of the list that I maintain on my EVERYTHING 2.0 blog — http://bobstumpel.blogspot.com. It has been substantially extended.

Brgrds, BOB

]]> By: » 5 Power laws in Web 2.0 - 5 leyes poderosas en la Web 2.0http://twopointouch.com/2006/business/5-power-laws-in-web-20/#comment-203 » 5 Power laws in Web 2.0 - 5 leyes poderosas en la Web 2.0 Fri, 11 Aug 2006 20:05:46 +0000 http://twopointouch.com/2006/08/07/5-power-laws-in-web-20/#comment-203 [...] Via twopointouch [...] […] Via twopointouch […]

]]> By: Ian Delaneyhttp://twopointouch.com/2006/business/5-power-laws-in-web-20/#comment-197 Ian Delaney Thu, 10 Aug 2006 22:36:44 +0000 http://twopointouch.com/2006/08/07/5-power-laws-in-web-20/#comment-197 Hi there Bob, Didn't realise this was a contentious issue. Not quite sure how to proceed. Will give next link(s) to such a list to your site. Ian Hi there Bob,

Didn’t realise this was a contentious issue. Not quite sure how to proceed. Will give next link(s) to such a list to your site.

Ian

]]> By: Bob Stumpelhttp://twopointouch.com/2006/business/5-power-laws-in-web-20/#comment-194 Bob Stumpel Thu, 10 Aug 2006 20:07:27 +0000 http://twopointouch.com/2006/08/07/5-power-laws-in-web-20/#comment-194 What you refer to as "The famous Sacred Cow Dung list of Web 2.0 sites" is in fact my list, and it's actual unabridged version is maintained in my EVERYTHING 2.0 blog, at http://bobstumpel.blogspot.com. Since a last consolidation in the BOOKMARK 2.0 sub-list (cf. http://bobstumpel.blogspot.com/2006/07/bookmark-20.html), which holds close to 130 links, I published about 25 more. Bob Stumpel What you refer to as “The famous Sacred Cow Dung list of Web 2.0 sites” is in fact my list, and it’s actual unabridged version is maintained in my EVERYTHING 2.0 blog, at http://bobstumpel.blogspot.com.
Since a last consolidation in the BOOKMARK 2.0 sub-list (cf. http://bobstumpel.blogspot.com/2006/07/bookmark-20.html), which holds close to 130 links, I published about 25 more.

Bob Stumpel

]]> By: Ian Delaneyhttp://twopointouch.com/2006/business/5-power-laws-in-web-20/#comment-181 Ian Delaney Tue, 08 Aug 2006 08:49:10 +0000 http://twopointouch.com/2006/08/07/5-power-laws-in-web-20/#comment-181 Fair point, Marc - I can see I was overly cynical there. Your Wikipedia article proposed a very good idea - jump-starting the semantic web by giving the tools to one very influential community with a large database. Fair point, Marc — I can see I was overly cynical there. Your Wikipedia article proposed a very good idea — jump-starting the semantic web by giving the tools to one very influential community with a large database.

]]> By: Marc - Stuck @ the Marriotthttp://twopointouch.com/2006/business/5-power-laws-in-web-20/#comment-180 Marc - Stuck @ the Marriott Tue, 08 Aug 2006 04:03:38 +0000 http://twopointouch.com/2006/08/07/5-power-laws-in-web-20/#comment-180 The digg observation is correct except for one very important aspect: if the content of your post isn't remarkable in some way then it won't get linked to from thousands of websites. In other words, average content = very short tail. I still get over 100 hits a day for the Wikipedia 3.0 article which was published over 40 days ago!!! but I still don't know what's remarkable about it :) It's linked to rom almost 7,000 sites according to MSN, which is why it has such a long tail. The 36 hour thing applies only to average content. Write something meaningful and you'll have a mini-religion. I mean isn't religion the strongest virus ever? Marc The digg observation is correct except for one very important aspect: if the content of your post isn’t remarkable in some way then it won’t get linked to from thousands of websites. In other words, average content = very short tail.

I still get over 100 hits a day for the Wikipedia 3.0 article which was published over 40 days ago!!! but I still don’t know what’s remarkable about it :) It’s linked to rom almost 7,000 sites according to MSN, which is why it has such a long tail.

The 36 hour thing applies only to average content. Write something meaningful and you’ll have a mini-religion. I mean isn’t religion the strongest virus ever?

Marc

]]> By: TheBizofKnowledgehttp://twopointouch.com/2006/business/5-power-laws-in-web-20/#comment-179 TheBizofKnowledge Mon, 07 Aug 2006 23:25:04 +0000 http://twopointouch.com/2006/08/07/5-power-laws-in-web-20/#comment-179 I came across your blog while browsing through Technorati. I just wanted to say that I completely agree with the points you made in your post -- especially in regards to AdSense and Digg. I was a bit surprised by the fact that 1.8% of Wikipedia users contribute 72% of the content. That's a much lower percentage of contributors than I would have guessed.... I came across your blog while browsing through Technorati. I just wanted to say that I completely agree with the points you made in your post — especially in regards to AdSense and Digg. I was a bit surprised by the fact that 1.8% of Wikipedia users contribute 72% of the content. That’s a much lower percentage of contributors than I would have guessed.…

]]>