Reasons to be Cheerful

I reckon the ‘Time Person of the Year is You’ story (please see what looks like nearly every other blog) has probably been exhausted for whatever wisdom it may have con­tained. It’s still worth a dip inside, though, for the Web 2.0 article backing up the choice.

Five reasons that ‘bubble 2.0′ is dif­ferent from the last:

Pain: Since today’s invest­ments are ‘nan­o­potatos’ compared to those of ’99, com­panies that fail won’t ruin their investors.

Profit: While it took eight years for Amazon to become prof­it­able, today’s com­panies either want (or need) to be prof­it­able fast, or at least show huge numbers of users, so they’ll be inter­esting to the big boys.

Bill Gates: Bill who? Sergey and Larry are the kings of Web 2.0. Dave Winer quoted saying that Web 2.0 com­panies are simply ‘acting as sales reps for Google ads’.

Food: Apparently, Om Malik didn’t have to buy dinner for three months at a time during the dotcom boom. Nowadays, there’s no such thing as a free lunch. (boo!)

Burn Rate: Remember that expres­sion? Referred to how quickly com­panies could eat through the massive invest­ments they’d received from VCs. Since they don’t get quite such large invest­ments nowadays, com­panies are sup­posedly eking out their resources a lot more carefully.

All of this tallies with what everyone’s been telling me for the last six months. You can’t really have a bubble unless the prop­er­ties in the market are vastly over-​​valued. While the YouTube acquis­i­tion for $1.65bn still sounds like an extraordinary amount of money, we’re not hearing stories like that very often. There’s also very few IPOs — I believe the European business net­working site Xing is the only company in this category to do so. While this is partly down to increased and expensive fin­an­cial legis­la­tion in the US — Sarbanes Oxley and the like, I think it’s also down to the real­isa­tion that today such offer­ings are unlikely to bring in much more money than the com­panies are worth.

All good news, I think — apart from the ‘no free lunch’ bit.

Share this post:

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Possibly related:

2 comments to Reasons to be Cheerful

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>