Then Shall I Know Even as Also I am Known

I wrote yes­terday that the emerging news about Search Wikia seemed a tad con­fusing. There’s good reason for that. In an inter­view between Danny Sullivan and Jimmy Wales, the Wikimedia found­a­tion boss says that he didn’t entirely intend the project to be made public yet, since it hasn’t really been started. Wales told a reporter on the Times that he had an idea for search, and suddenly it became big news.

As far as I can see, the idea is a web search engine in which the answers and even the algorithm are tweaked by the ‘crowd’. Though similar in some respects to the Open Directory, everyone would have some sort of a say, in a similar way to Wikipedia.

Q. How do you envision the com­munity par­ti­cip­ating? Will they be selecting sites? Will this leverage material in Wikipedia? Will they rate sites?

If I had to spec­u­late about it, I would say it’s several of those things, not just com­munity involved with rating URLs but also com­munity rating for whole web sites, what to include or not to include and also the whole algorithm … That’s a human type process that we can empower people to guide the spider.

The problem with search as it is will be familiar to anyone who has searched for a com­mer­cial service. If you search for London Hotels or want to buy a wii, then there’s no way to know which sites to trust. The top results seem to be the best optim­ised for Google, not the best ones for you to buy from. Wales believes trans­par­ency in the reasons for a site’s position in the listings is the only way to create trust in search results.

Exactly how this will happen is still very much open to debate. It’s unclear, for example, how this will differ from the human-​​generated searches using col­lective intel­li­gence on services like del.icio.us and wink. I’m also inter­ested in how the site might go about coun­ter­acting spam — busi­nesses and their agents, perhaps auto­mated, recom­mending their own sites. However, Wales suggests that there aren’t nearly so many spammers as you might think, and identi­fying and banning them is not incon­ceiv­able. The success of the human-​​powered comment spam service Akismet gives me hope that this is possible.

One other reason they might succeed: Search Wikia has already raised $4mn in angel funding. Money isn’t a cure for bad ideas, but it gives you time to make a few mistakes finding out how to make the thing work.

Share this post:

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Possibly related:

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>