A report at FT.com sums up a recent survey by Jupiter Research. The amount of time devoted by Europeans to web use has, for the first time, overtaken the time they spend reading newspapers and magazines:
Print consumption has remained static at three hours a week in the past two years, as time spent online has doubled from two to four hours. Viewers are also spending more time watching television, up from 10 hours to 12 a week.
The adoption of broadband is shown to have a very positive effect on online consumption:
In France, where 79 per cent of online households have broadband connections, the typical user is online for five hours a week, compared with only three hours a week in Germany, which has a broadband penetration rate of 42 per cent.
Interestingly, the report identifies no losers in its survey, only increasing media consumption all round. Once again, the idea that traditional media are being driven into bankruptcy as our lives move online is shown to be not strictly true. Since there are no more hours in the day, one can only assume that the real losers are books, fresh air, face-to-face socialising and sleep. At the risk of sounding like my mum, this is not a development I can wholeheartedly welcome as positive, as much as I love the net.
However, the averages supplied in the headline statistics mask some clear differences in consumption patterns based on age:
The research found “a very clear new media/old media generational divideâ€, Mr Mulligan [research director at Jupiter] said. Under-25s now spend six hours a week online, half the time they spend watching television but three times the hours they devote to print.
So, the average amount of time spent online is four hours, but young people are up to six hours, and they’re watching less TV and reading less. It seems as though the implication of this is that the trends are reversed at the age of 25. Older people are watching a lot more TV and reading more papers and magazines. Their internet use must be far less than double what it was, to compensate for the six hours consumed by younger people.
Thanks, Antony






















Recent Comments