Flog More Stuff 2.0

Public Relations in the Web 2.0 era? A new white paper has been produced by Squiz in asso­ci­ation with Text 100 PR called Communications 2.0. It’s avail­able here (regis­tra­tion required).

The paper dis­cusses what Web 2.0 is, how busi­nesses might adopt some of the approaches it brings, how their PR will change as a result and ends with a ‘manifesto’…

To practise Communications 2.0 is to:

  1. Cede a portion of edit­orial control to your users – give them proper channels where they can get involved
  2. Treat your web site as a database of content, not a static pub­lic­a­tion – use open standards-​​based technology
  3. Incorporate user-​​generated content into your web site to help cross and up-​​sell your services – offer comment sections, forums and content-​​tagging
  4. Place a web com­ponent within every single com­mu­nic­a­tions exercise – all your audi­ences are on the web so this is man­datory (to ignore the web would be like having an early 20th century ad campaign without newspapers!)
  5. Look before you leap – Listening and mon­it­oring through tools such as blogs should become a no-​​brainer. It’s an excel­lent way to dip your toe into the water, under­stand what’s going on and even get input from your com­munity on the best way to pursue further engagement
  6. Assess your organ­iz­a­tional read­i­ness and prepare your engage­ment care­fully — you need to consider HR, legal and IT issues before you embark on a new ‘com­mu­nic­a­tions 2.0’ strategy
  7. Develop a new PR policy – decide what you should do, why you’re doing it and then, in the words a famous sports shoe man­u­fac­turer, JUST DO IT!
  8. Consider the use open source software in order to deploy new com­mu­nic­a­tions channels cost-​​effectively – don’t reinvent the wheel: the solution is out there somewhere
  9. Introduce new web-​​based tactics quickly and often – you have nothing to lose — everyone remem­bers the suc­cesses and forgets the (inex­pensive) failures
  10. Measure everything that you do, all of the time – it’s easy with the web. Make sure you get your hands on decent web site stats and talk to your PR/​web agency about how you can track cam­paigns more effectively
  11. Invest in the tactics that are working and pull the one’s that aren’t
  12. Approach the dis­cip­line of com­mu­nic­a­tions as a process, a dialogue – don’t be afraid of the market talking back….embrace user comment and content and put mech­an­isms in place that encourage it – it’s far cheaper than a focus group

I know the paper wasn’t really intended for public con­sump­tion but I find this a little dis­turbing. They’re talking about the Web 2.0 era or attitude purely as a way to flog more stuff (check number 3). User content as a cheap focus group (12). Also, don’t 6, 7 and 9 con­tra­dict each other? Either you act quickly because failures don’t matter (9) and JUST DO IT (7) or you plan care­fully (6). For me, one of the key advant­ages of this brave new world for com­panies is that it gives them the chance to be better and make better stuff. The paper doesn’t say anything about that. But maybe that’s just me in my little dream world.

I’m sure that my PR col­leagues Simon, Simon, Antony, Drew and Stuart — who actually have some expertise in these matters — will have more to say on this subject.

Share this post:

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Possibly related:

6 comments to Flog More Stuff 2.0

  • Heather Smith

    Not the best way to approach this “brave new world” as you say. But then again, agit­ators for adopting social web approaches do need to sell them in to pretty negative people. If “flogging more stuff” helps there argument, then I can under­stand it.

  • On reflec­tion, I think I was a little harsh in my comments. Yes, of course com­panies need to see the com­mer­cial sense in looking at these approaches. However, I stand by the view that Web 2.0 offers com­panies a lot more than a more effi­cient sales tool.

  • Ian,

    I think there is nothing wrong with selling stuff using Web 2.0 prin­ciples, but I think the key point is that com­panies can’t use the tried and tested methods in a social envir­on­ment, as Walmart found out the message, medium and have to be coherent.

    Anyway, I ref­er­ence this post in a post I did here at Broadstuff

    Interesting site btw!

  • Thanks, Alan. I’ve already found Broadstuff a couple of weeks ago and have been fol­lowing your posts with interest.

    No, nothing wrong with selling things, and my intent was not to seem anti-​​business. However, that will be a product of having a site that’s helpful, human, inter­esting, authentic and two-​​way. It’s not a question of the site saying “here’s some user-​​generated gubbins, now buy this” as point three suggests.

  • Web 2.0 PR guide and FOI act issues…

    I was asked to take part in a couple of dis­cus­sions this evening. First one off, journ­alist Dennis Howlett (if you don’t know him, he’s Joe’s Dad) has pointed out that there is a petition on the short­com­ings of the…

  • […] One of the most dif­fi­cult things to prove, and a recur­ring theme on this blog, is a business case for social media /​ web 2.0 /​ call it what you will. I saw this whilst reading Drew B’s social media blog and it got me thinking, surely the best place to work on the business case for web 2.0 is here, in the blogosphere. […]

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>