<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Flog More Stuff 2.0</title> <atom:link href="http://twopointouch.com/2006/social-media/flog-more-stuff-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://twopointouch.com/2006/social-media/flog-more-stuff-20/</link> <description>web 2.0, blogs and social media</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 20:58:01 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator> <item><title>By: Ian Delaney</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2006/social-media/flog-more-stuff-20/#comment-4191</link> <dc:creator>Ian Delaney</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 22:37:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2006/11/27/flog-more-stuff-20/#comment-4191</guid> <description>Thanks, Alan. I&#039;ve already found Broadstuff a couple of weeks ago and have been following your posts with interest.
No, nothing wrong with selling things, and my intent was not to seem anti-business. However, that will be a product of having a site that&#039;s helpful, human, interesting, authentic and two-way. It&#039;s not a question of the site saying &quot;here&#039;s some user-generated gubbins, now buy this&quot; as point three suggests.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Alan. I’ve already found Broadstuff a couple of weeks ago and have been following your posts with interest.</p><p>No, nothing wrong with selling things, and my intent was not to seem anti-business. However, that will be a product of having a site that’s helpful, human, interesting, authentic and two-way. It’s not a question of the site saying “here’s some user-generated gubbins, now buy this” as point three suggests.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: alan patrick</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2006/social-media/flog-more-stuff-20/#comment-4188</link> <dc:creator>alan patrick</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 21:59:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2006/11/27/flog-more-stuff-20/#comment-4188</guid> <description>Ian,
I think there is nothing wrong with selling stuff using Web 2.0 principles, but I think the key point is that companies can&#039;t use the tried and tested methods in a social environment, as Walmart found out the message, medium and have to be coherent.
Anyway, I reference this post in a post I did &lt;a&gt;here at Broadstuff&lt;/a&gt;
Interesting site btw!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian,</p><p>I think there is nothing wrong with selling stuff using Web 2.0 principles, but I think the key point is that companies can’t use the tried and tested methods in a social environment, as Walmart found out the message, medium and have to be coherent.</p><p>Anyway, I reference this post in a post I did <a>here at Broadstuff</a></p><p>Interesting site btw!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Selling Web 2.0 &#171; All things PR</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2006/social-media/flog-more-stuff-20/#comment-4167</link> <dc:creator>Selling Web 2.0 &#171; All things PR</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 16:00:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2006/11/27/flog-more-stuff-20/#comment-4167</guid> <description>[...] One of the most difficult things to prove, and a recurring theme on this blog, is a business case for social media / web 2.0 / call it what you will. I saw this whilst reading Drew B&#8217;s social media blog and it got me thinking, surely the best place to work on the business case for web 2.0 is here, in the blogosphere. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] One of the most difficult things to prove, and a recurring theme on this blog, is a business case for social media / web 2.0 / call it what you will. I saw this whilst reading Drew B’s social media blog and it got me thinking, surely the best place to work on the business case for web 2.0 is here, in the blogosphere. […]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ian Delaney</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2006/social-media/flog-more-stuff-20/#comment-3979</link> <dc:creator>Ian Delaney</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 19:21:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2006/11/27/flog-more-stuff-20/#comment-3979</guid> <description>On reflection, I think I was a little harsh in my comments. Yes, of course companies need to see the commercial sense in looking at these approaches. However, I stand by the view that Web 2.0 offers companies a lot more than a more efficient sales tool.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On reflection, I think I was a little harsh in my comments. Yes, of course companies need to see the commercial sense in looking at these approaches. However, I stand by the view that Web 2.0 offers companies a lot more than a more efficient sales tool.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Heather Smith</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2006/social-media/flog-more-stuff-20/#comment-3956</link> <dc:creator>Heather Smith</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 00:35:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2006/11/27/flog-more-stuff-20/#comment-3956</guid> <description>Not the best way to approach this &quot;brave new world&quot; as you say. But then again, agitators for adopting social web approaches do need to sell them in to pretty negative people. If &quot;flogging more stuff&quot; helps there argument, then I can understand it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not the best way to approach this “brave new world” as you say. But then again, agitators for adopting social web approaches do need to sell them in to pretty negative people. If “flogging more stuff” helps there argument, then I can understand it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Drew B's take on tech PR</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2006/social-media/flog-more-stuff-20/#comment-3953</link> <dc:creator>Drew B's take on tech PR</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 23:44:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2006/11/27/flog-more-stuff-20/#comment-3953</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;Web 2.0 PR guide and FOI act issues...&lt;/strong&gt;
I was asked to take part in a couple of discussions this evening. First one off, journalist Dennis Howlett (if you don&#039;t know him, he&#039;s Joe&#039;s Dad) has pointed out that there is a petition on the shortcomings of the...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Web 2.0 PR guide and FOI act issues…</strong></p><p>I was asked to take part in a couple of discussions this evening. First one off, journalist Dennis Howlett (if you don’t know him, he’s Joe’s Dad) has pointed out that there is a petition on the shortcomings of the…</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
