<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Digg is (a) bull, says Evolving Trends</title> <atom:link href="http://twopointouch.com/2006/web-2-0/digg-is-a-bull-says-evolving-trends/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://twopointouch.com/2006/web-2-0/digg-is-a-bull-says-evolving-trends/</link> <description>web 2.0, blogs and social media</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 20:58:01 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator> <item><title>By: twopointouch &#187; Wisdom 2.0</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2006/web-2-0/digg-is-a-bull-says-evolving-trends/#comment-9</link> <dc:creator>twopointouch &#187; Wisdom 2.0</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 15:11:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/?p=12#comment-9</guid> <description>[...] Marc Fawzi at Evolving Trends attacks the whole notion of the wisdom of crowds. It&#8217;s a development of the disappointing experience he had when digg suddenly made him the number one site on Wordpress for a short period, apparently on the basis that he had come up with a catchy headline. More on that story below. He concludes that &#8220;while a crowd can be a decent calculator of subjective measurable value, it will always produce a dumb choice when it comes to subjective quality&#8221; and calls for a return to the old order whereby experienced editors and qualified professionals decided what&#8217;s important. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] Marc Fawzi at Evolving Trends attacks the whole notion of the wisdom of crowds. It’s a development of the disappointing experience he had when digg suddenly made him the number one site on WordPress for a short period, apparently on the basis that he had come up with a catchy headline. More on that story below. He concludes that “while a crowd can be a decent calculator of subjective measurable value, it will always produce a dumb choice when it comes to subjective quality” and calls for a return to the old order whereby experienced editors and qualified professionals decided what’s important. […]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
