Good News for Homepage 2.0

homepagepoll

It’s not important for you to know my name -
Nor I to know yours
If we com­mu­nicate for two minutes only
It will be enough
For knowing that someone in this world
Feels as des­perate as me -
And what you give is what you get.

It doesn’t matter if we never meet again,
What we have said will always remain.
If we get through for two minutes only,
It will be a start!
(The Jam, Start!)

There’s nothing like stat­ist­ical rigor when it comes to research. And my little poll here is nothing like stat­ist­ic­ally rigorous. However, it’s been sitting there for more than two weeks while readers patently ignored it and it’s time to talk about the results. Anyway, it seems that it is at least as valid as a lot of the polls you read in the papers.

It’s good news for the Web 2.0 guys. While they were the least popular of the three options I presented, they still managed to garner six votes. Since the combined forces of Yahoo, Microsoft and Google only managed ten, I’d call that a pretty solid presence.

“Yeah, right, Ian,” I hear you mutter. “Twenty-​​three votes is nothing, for a start. Plus you’re polling people who read a blog about Web 2.0 and stuff.”

True enough. However, my own expect­a­tion was the main­stream sites would com­pletely dominate the new­comers, and that most people would vote for no per­son­al­ised homepage. I use vanilla Google myself, but most of the time I’m actually going some­where else, so “about:none” (which gives you a blank start page) would actually make more sense. Because of this bias, I assumed most people were the same. They’re not.

Netvibes appar­ently has at least four million users and recently attracted $15mn in seed fin­an­cing. Leading com­pet­itor Pageflakes — backed to an undis­closed figure by Benchmark Capital — pre­sum­ably has similar user numbers. New entrant Webwag will have fewer, having only just launched. It’s a rocky market, though: Fold.com ahem.. folded on June 3rd, becoming the first entrant to Techcrunch’s Web 2.0 deadpool. On the other hand, single page aggreg­ators, like popurls, are also on the rise. These sites are similar in some respects to the Netvibes crowd, since they put together a bunch of related feeds onto a single page.

It’s pure spec­u­la­tion, of course, but the pop­ularity of these pages might be ascribed to a couple of things:

1) It takes me an hour to read through the 107 111 blogs I sub­scribe to through bloglines. If I miss a day, it might take two hours. I don’t always have that sort of time. What if I could just get the important stuff on a single page? (cf. Ross Mayfield’s desire for a version of Techmeme that is actually MeMeme)

2) If I then need to visit a calendar, to-​​do list and a webmail site to complete my catch-​​up, that’s at least another 30 minutes. The per­son­al­ised home pages can stick that on the same page as my news.

There are good reasons to use these pages. The question remains, though, as to how these sites are going to make any money. Netvibes, Pageflakes and Webwag haven’t even got any adverts. There’s talk of affil­iate deals with Kelkoo, Amazon and so forth, but I see no evidence of that on the pages I’ve set up for myself using these services. Plus, there’s intense com­pet­i­tion from main­stream players like Google as well as other AJAX homepage startups. Chris Lake raised this issue back in June.

If I were the boss of Google, Yahoo or MS Live — you know, com­panies that have (a) an existing per­son­al­ised start page service and (b) loads of advert­isers looking for inventory — I’d be looking very care­fully at Netvibes et al. Then I’d copy whatever it is that they’re doing to attract so many users and try to shut them down. Wouldn’t you?

Share this post:

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Possibly related:

1 comment to Good News for Homepage 2.0

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>