<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: The newspaper story, UK edition</title> <atom:link href="http://twopointouch.com/2006/websites/the-newspaper-story-uk-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://twopointouch.com/2006/websites/the-newspaper-story-uk-edition/</link> <description>web 2.0, blogs and social media</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 20:58:01 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator> <item><title>By: More Web 2.0 is Better&#8230; Sometimes at twopointouch: web 2.0, blogs and social media</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2006/websites/the-newspaper-story-uk-edition/#comment-480</link> <dc:creator>More Web 2.0 is Better&#8230; Sometimes at twopointouch: web 2.0, blogs and social media</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 12:45:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2006/08/10/the-newspaper-story-uk-edition/#comment-480</guid> <description>[...] What&#8217;s the business case for Web 2.0 technologies? Well, it depends on your business. For newspaper publishers, the answer appears to be that more is better. You may recall from an earlier post that the Guardian newspaper website tops the league in the UK for Web 2.0 features (research conduction by Robin Hamman. click for bigger): [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] What’s the business case for Web 2.0 technologies? Well, it depends on your business. For newspaper publishers, the answer appears to be that more is better. You may recall from an earlier post that the Guardian newspaper website tops the league in the UK for Web 2.0 features (research conduction by Robin Hamman. click for bigger): […]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ian Delaney</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2006/websites/the-newspaper-story-uk-edition/#comment-191</link> <dc:creator>Ian Delaney</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 14:53:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2006/08/10/the-newspaper-story-uk-edition/#comment-191</guid> <description>Thanks for the tip-off, Robin. Good work!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the tip-off, Robin. Good work!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Robin Hamman</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2006/websites/the-newspaper-story-uk-edition/#comment-190</link> <dc:creator>Robin Hamman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 14:47:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2006/08/10/the-newspaper-story-uk-edition/#comment-190</guid> <description>I&#039;ve updated the graph above with a new version after being alerted that some of the web features missing from the guardian were in fact present and correct, just rather well buried from view... Feel free to update the image above with the new one.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve updated the graph above with a new version after being alerted that some of the web features missing from the guardian were in fact present and correct, just rather well buried from view… Feel free to update the image above with the new one.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
