<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: We, the Audience</title> <atom:link href="http://twopointouch.com/2007/09/25/we-the-audience/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://twopointouch.com/2007/social-media/we-the-audience/</link> <description>web 2.0, blogs and social media</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 20:58:01 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator> <item><title>By: Ugly Betty is lost! but Web 2.0 version 3.7 is available as a PDF download - The Yourdon Report - Blogging the impact of computer-related technology trends, and whatever else catches my interest.</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2007/social-media/we-the-audience/#comment-11587</link> <dc:creator>Ugly Betty is lost! but Web 2.0 version 3.7 is available as a PDF download - The Yourdon Report - Blogging the impact of computer-related technology trends, and whatever else catches my interest.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 01:48:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2007/09/25/we-the-audience/#comment-11587</guid> <description>[...] page 38: I added a bullet point that contains a link to an article about on aspect of the &#8220;1% rule&#8221; &#8212; i.e., that 2% of Wiki users generate 60% of it [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] page 38: I added a bullet point that contains a link to an article about on aspect of the “1% rule” — i.e., that 2% of Wiki users generate 60% of it […]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ian Delaney</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2007/social-media/we-the-audience/#comment-11582</link> <dc:creator>Ian Delaney</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 21:04:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2007/09/25/we-the-audience/#comment-11582</guid> <description>I&#039;ll get back to thoof asap and check it again.
Thanks for your contribution, Scott.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ll get back to thoof asap and check it again.</p><p>Thanks for your contribution, Scott.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Scott Miller</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2007/social-media/we-the-audience/#comment-11581</link> <dc:creator>Scott Miller</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 20:47:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2007/09/25/we-the-audience/#comment-11581</guid> <description>Thats only true if you&#039;re measuring the number of people as a whole.  If you measure out of everyone who sees a story, how many found it interesting, and use that as a ratio, you&#039;re measuring interest, not popularity.  Its *popularity* that causes a &quot;topic du jour&quot; effect.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats only true if you’re measuring the number of people as a whole.  If you measure out of everyone who sees a story, how many found it interesting, and use that as a ratio, you’re measuring interest, not popularity.  Its *popularity* that causes a “topic du jour” effect.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ian Delaney</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2007/social-media/we-the-audience/#comment-11579</link> <dc:creator>Ian Delaney</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 19:49:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2007/09/25/we-the-audience/#comment-11579</guid> <description>&quot;People as a whole&quot; feels equivalent to the (utterly lame IMHO) techmeme effect where dozens of bloggers add their own (worthless) comment to the topic du jour. I don&#039;t want the topic du jour - I want the really interesting &quot;fact-et&quot; that no-one else has latched onto.
BTW, full respect for what you&#039;re doing. Finding that random factet takes me hours and you guys can make it automated for most. But I don&#039;t trust you to find the thing I&#039;m looking for. Sorry :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“People as a whole” feels equivalent to the (utterly lame IMHO) techmeme effect where dozens of bloggers add their own (worthless) comment to the topic du jour. I don’t want the topic du jour — I want the really interesting “fact-et” that no-one else has latched onto.</p><p>BTW, full respect for what you’re doing. Finding that random factet takes me hours and you guys can make it automated for most. But I don’t trust you to find the thing I’m looking for. Sorry :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Scott Miller</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2007/social-media/we-the-audience/#comment-11578</link> <dc:creator>Scott Miller</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 19:31:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2007/09/25/we-the-audience/#comment-11578</guid> <description>Not at all, we merely measure the interest in all articles, and show you things that are &quot;highly interesting&quot; to people as a whole, regardless of your particular topic interests.  Note that the way we measure interesting is also independent of the number of readers, so you don&#039;t get a &quot;Digg effect&quot; of the masses boosting a story.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not at all, we merely measure the interest in all articles, and show you things that are “highly interesting” to people as a whole, regardless of your particular topic interests.  Note that the way we measure interesting is also independent of the number of readers, so you don’t get a “Digg effect” of the masses boosting a story.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ian Delaney</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2007/social-media/we-the-audience/#comment-11575</link> <dc:creator>Ian Delaney</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 18:47:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2007/09/25/we-the-audience/#comment-11575</guid> <description>Thanks for the comment, Scott. But surely, that would involve some sort of editorial judgement if you&#039;re to find interesting things that I haven&#039;t shown an interest in? In which case, how do you know what that is?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, Scott. But surely, that would involve some sort of editorial judgement if you’re to find interesting things that I haven’t shown an interest in? In which case, how do you know what that is?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Scott Miller</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2007/social-media/we-the-audience/#comment-11568</link> <dc:creator>Scott Miller</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 14:45:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2007/09/25/we-the-audience/#comment-11568</guid> <description>You mention sites like Thoof not gaining your trust because they only show you what you read.  We&#039;re well aware of that, which is why what Thoof shows you is a mix of what you&#039;ve shown you like, and what is interesting even if you haven&#039;t seen things like it yet.
It doesn&#039;t have to be either/or.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mention sites like Thoof not gaining your trust because they only show you what you read.  We’re well aware of that, which is why what Thoof shows you is a mix of what you’ve shown you like, and what is interesting even if you haven’t seen things like it yet.</p><p>It doesn’t have to be either/or.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: BUZZBIZWEB &#187; Blog Archive</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2007/social-media/we-the-audience/#comment-11564</link> <dc:creator>BUZZBIZWEB &#187; Blog Archive</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 22:38:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2007/09/25/we-the-audience/#comment-11564</guid> <description>[...] excellent article lu sur le blog Two Point Touch rétabli la vérité sur la contribution des internautes sur les sites dits « sociaux » [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] excellent article lu sur le blog Two Point Touch rétabli la vérité sur la contribution des internautes sur les sites dits « sociaux » […]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Born On The Web &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2007-09-27</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2007/social-media/we-the-audience/#comment-11552</link> <dc:creator>Born On The Web &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2007-09-27</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 00:35:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2007/09/25/we-the-audience/#comment-11552</guid> <description>[...] twopointouch : We, the Audience nuance on 1% rule (tags: community social socialmedia) [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] twopointouch : We, the Audience nuance on 1% rule (tags: community social socialmedia) […]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Loving Links &#171; The Rosemont Loving</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2007/social-media/we-the-audience/#comment-11549</link> <dc:creator>Loving Links &#171; The Rosemont Loving</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:10:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2007/09/25/we-the-audience/#comment-11549</guid> <description>[...] 2004        Loving&#160;Links Wednesday September 26th 2007, 10:09 am  Filed under: Links  1. Twopointouch - We, the [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] 2004        Loving Links Wednesday September 26th 2007, 10:09 am  Filed under: Links  1. Twopointouch — We, the […]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
