<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Pube-licity Stunt</title> <atom:link href="http://twopointouch.com/2007/business/pube-licity-stunt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://twopointouch.com/2007/business/pube-licity-stunt/</link> <description>web 2.0, blogs and social media</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 20:58:01 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator> <item><title>By: Ian Delaney</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2007/business/pube-licity-stunt/#comment-11485</link> <dc:creator>Ian Delaney</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:02:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2007/09/13/pube-licity-stunt/#comment-11485</guid> <description>So the more successful it is, the less appealing the site becomes! Genius.
I&#039;ve updated the post slightly, Lloyd, to describe the site a tad more fully.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the more successful it is, the less appealing the site becomes! Genius.</p><p>I’ve updated the post slightly, Lloyd, to describe the site a tad more fully.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lloyd Davis</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2007/business/pube-licity-stunt/#comment-11484</link> <dc:creator>Lloyd Davis</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 12:46:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2007/09/13/pube-licity-stunt/#comment-11484</guid> <description>OK. I&#039;m stunned.
Actually you do it a slight disservice by saying there&#039;s nothing there but ads.  There is a picture of the nether regions of a young lady in dayglo bikini bottoms sporting a CND symbol.  Not a hair in sight and lots of parts of her that I wouldn&#039;t call pubic.
Of course even if this pic were of interest to pubescent boys, though I&#039;m sure they can find more stimulating material elsewhere, the problem is the juicy (sorry) bits are going to disappear behind ads!  And are they in the market for SEO (one company seems to have dropped $8,000 on this - assuming that they are not the people behind it in the first place)
Stunned. Please tell me it&#039;s a joke.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK. I’m stunned.</p><p>Actually you do it a slight disservice by saying there’s nothing there but ads.  There is a picture of the nether regions of a young lady in dayglo bikini bottoms sporting a CND symbol.  Not a hair in sight and lots of parts of her that I wouldn’t call pubic.</p><p>Of course even if this pic were of interest to pubescent boys, though I’m sure they can find more stimulating material elsewhere, the problem is the juicy (sorry) bits are going to disappear behind ads!  And are they in the market for SEO (one company seems to have dropped $8,000 on this — assuming that they are not the people behind it in the first place)</p><p>Stunned. Please tell me it’s a joke.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
