Panel Beating

So, I’m on a panel about how brands can benefit or suffer from involve­ment with social media at the forth­coming Blogging4Business event.

Good examples we all know about: Dell (addresses Dell Hell service com­plaints with its own blog; learns from early mistakes on said blog), Microsoft (developer social network; but also taking stick over its blogger laptop giveaway), Nokia (blogger rela­tions campaign)

Bad examples we all know about: Walmart (pretty much everything they do), Sony (fake blog), Ask (fake ‘under­ground’ campaign).

I’m on a panel with Antony ‘wrote the book about social media’ Mayfield, though, so I don’t want the examples that he’ll bring up — five seconds before I’m due to speak — leaving me with a con­tri­bu­tion that goes some­thing like ‘Yeah… err… Antony’s right. You do have to be careful and trans­parent and that.…’

I’ve already found an excel­lent positive example. Doggysnaps (beta) is a social network developed by the Dogs Trust. The gist of it is that you — a dog lover — upload pictures of your dog and look at the pictures uploaded by other members. It’s flickr for dogs, basic­ally, you can tag and comment on others’ snaps. There’s a dog of the week and a ton of forums giving dog care advice. What’s this got to do with neg­lected dogs, then? Well, the com­munity can also buy mer­chandise, donate directly, and I under­stand that there are plans to intro­duce a means to adopt dogs in care.

The bad example? That’s where you come in. Companies, please, that have gone about approaching social media in a totally cack-​​handed way, earning them torrents of abuse. Not-​​so-​​well-​​known cases espe­cially welcome. Via the comments or email, please.

Share this post:

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Possibly related:

1 comment to Panel Beating

  • So, what are the criteria for a “good” blog site and a “bad” blog site? I think a “good” site can measured in terms of how well the site actually ACTS on the comments of its users or how well the users can help each other.

    For me, a par­tic­u­larly bad example is Yahoo’s “Ask Other Yahoo! Mail Users” which is a “blog” for users to ask each other about problems they encounter in Yahoo.

    Just reading through them you can see that Yahoo!‘s dev team does not read its own forum. For those that are answered, Yahoo! chooses which answer is the best. Don’t you think that is some­thing the reader should do?

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>