<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: A Last Note on the Carphone Warehouse Incident</title> <atom:link href="http://twopointouch.com/2008/05/24/a-last-note-on-the-carphone-warehouse-incident/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://twopointouch.com/2008/blogs/a-last-note-on-the-carphone-warehouse-incident/</link> <description>web 2.0, blogs and social media</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 20:58:01 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator> <item><title>By: ben</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2008/blogs/a-last-note-on-the-carphone-warehouse-incident/#comment-12972</link> <dc:creator>ben</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 21:11:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2008/05/24/a-last-note-on-the-carphone-warehouse-incident/#comment-12972</guid> <description>cpw is not triying to scam, they are the largest mobile phone retailer in the uk i know they dont try and scam its just difficult in a large company to be extremely efficeint</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cpw is not triying to scam, they are the largest mobile phone retailer in the uk i know they dont try and scam its just difficult in a large company to be extremely efficeint</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Carphone Warehouse listens&#160;&#124;&#160;PRBLOGGER.COM - PR blog</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2008/blogs/a-last-note-on-the-carphone-warehouse-incident/#comment-12944</link> <dc:creator>Carphone Warehouse listens&#160;&#124;&#160;PRBLOGGER.COM - PR blog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 13:55:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2008/05/24/a-last-note-on-the-carphone-warehouse-incident/#comment-12944</guid> <description>[...] his latest post on the issue Ian rightly states, &#8220;A lot of people might see this as a victory for blogs and [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] his latest post on the issue Ian rightly states, “A lot of people might see this as a victory for blogs and […]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ian Kemmish</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2008/blogs/a-last-note-on-the-carphone-warehouse-incident/#comment-12561</link> <dc:creator>Ian Kemmish</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 11:29:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2008/05/24/a-last-note-on-the-carphone-warehouse-incident/#comment-12561</guid> <description>I seriously doubt that CW have either the will or capacity to change.  I&#039;m pretty sure their behaviour comes from the top.  Remember that a few years back they were fined a six-digit sum for misleading door-to-door sales?  Over a year after that, I was still getting them on my doorstep with &quot;I just called to confirm that you got the discount on your phone bill&quot;  (How could I?  You already know I&#039;m not a customer!) That kind of thing only happens when it&#039;s sanctioned by senior management.
When a subsidiary of theirs was spamming me last year (twice a week for several months), the only thing that made them stop was a stern letter from the Data Protection Registrar.
Maybe you were lucky.  Maybe they were already under investigation for exactly the scam you suffered.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I seriously doubt that CW have either the will or capacity to change.  I’m pretty sure their behaviour comes from the top.  Remember that a few years back they were fined a six-digit sum for misleading door-to-door sales?  Over a year after that, I was still getting them on my doorstep with “I just called to confirm that you got the discount on your phone bill”  (How could I?  You already know I’m not a customer!) That kind of thing only happens when it’s sanctioned by senior management.</p><p>When a subsidiary of theirs was spamming me last year (twice a week for several months), the only thing that made them stop was a stern letter from the Data Protection Registrar.</p><p>Maybe you were lucky.  Maybe they were already under investigation for exactly the scam you suffered.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
