Twittiquette

Twitter has been going mad today on the subject of Qwitter (There’s also Twitter Karma, much the same thing, but I became aware of it earlier than Qwitter thanks to @ssethi).

The basic function of these sites is to show people you follow (receive updates from) who aren’t receiving your own updates.

So what’s the point of that, you ask?

Well, like a lot of social networks, on Twitter:

(a) the number and quality of fol­lowers you have is an indic­a­tion of status in this rather insular social media world. (Let’s forget about the recent arrival of the UK’s current Stately Homo Stephen Fry onto the scene).

(b) fol­lowing someone is an indic­a­tion of like and respect. I care enough to hear what you’re up to.

So if you follow someone, and they don’t follow you back (you get sent an email to say X is fol­lowing you), then it appears, sort of, that they don’t like or respect you very much.

You could do this quite easily before by clicking on the ‘fol­lowers’ link on your twitter home page, but these new sites make that inform­a­tion a lot easier to take in. A bit like in sites such as Facebook — you can see if someone hasn’t responded to your friend­ship request. But the thing is that Twitter itself has — his­tor­ic­ally — never shown any of that inform­a­tion in a way people could really take in and analyse. So it might come as a bit of a shock to some people that prom­inent twit­izens (oh, yes) aren’t hanging on their every word.

People might get upset when they discover they are fol­lowing people they thought had become friends (and probably are) but that those ‘friends’ are not fol­lowing them.

However, there are a few other possibilities:

  • they are already fol­lowing 200 other people and the noise from that is enough, thank you very much.
  • Dunbar’s Number — more than 150 people is more people than they can maintain stable rela­tion­ships with. There are already 150 or more people they are paying atten­tion to. It’s a psy­cho­lo­gical impossib­ility to take on someone else, no matter who.
  • they like you very much, but going in and fol­lowing you and dropping someone else is too much trouble.
  • they auto-​​delete ‘new follower’ emails. A strong tempta­tion if you get more than one a day.
  • they forgot.
  • they don’t care nearly as much about Twitter as you.
  • they have already linked to you on Linked-​​In, friended you on Facebook and sub­scribed to your RSS. That is enough.
  • they have a million far more important things to do that affect their ability to carry on working.

Elsewhere: Paul Walsh on the damaging effect of this and Charles Arthur on (slightly disputed) best practice.

Share this post:

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Possibly related:

3 comments to Twittiquette

  • Hmmmmm!

    “So if you follow someone, and they don’t follow you back (you get sent an email to say X is fol­lowing you), then it appears, sort of, that they don’t like or respect you very much.”

    Or, you cou;d consider how you Twitter, as perhaps that person likes and respects you plenty, but just can’t cope with the amount you put out there, or how many @‘s you do, or what you happen to talk about on Twitter.

    I think it’s time we seper­ated out this whole “I like you, I’ll follow you on Twitter” idea and sub­sti­tute it with “I’m followed on Twitter because what I say on Twitter is inter­esting to these people fol­lowing me”.

    I would never think that of the 500+ people fol­lowing me that they all “liked & respected” me. They just perhaps find what I say some­times amusing — more often than not or they’d ditch me. And if they did, I wouldn’t loose any sleep over it — just as I don’t when I unfollow both friends and just random Twitterers because their feed has become of less interest to me than others I follow.

  • very nice and very inter­esting
    thankx !

  • Twitter based mutual reci­pro­city is a sign that you are both highly inter­esting to each other or both author­ities in a similar niche and so in need of “watching”.

    The true measure of a fellow twitter user is if you can @ThanetStar or @LordMatt and get a reply.

    Then you know that you can talk whenever you wish even if he’s a fish blogger and you are a woodwork blogger. The daily tweets are of no interest but the occa­sional message… that’s different.

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>