<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Eatin’s Cheatin’ : The Backtype Plugin</title> <atom:link href="http://twopointouch.com/2009/blogs/eatin%e2%80%99s-cheatin%e2%80%99-the-backtype-plugin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://twopointouch.com/2009/blogs/eatin%e2%80%99s-cheatin%e2%80%99-the-backtype-plugin/</link> <description>web 2.0, blogs and social media</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 20:58:01 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator> <item><title>By: Ian Delaney</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2009/blogs/eatin%e2%80%99s-cheatin%e2%80%99-the-backtype-plugin/#comment-13109</link> <dc:creator>Ian Delaney</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 18:28:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/?p=862#comment-13109</guid> <description>As I recall, Blogger doesn&#039;t support the Trackbacks standard. Which makes it a poorer platform as far as inter-blog discussions are concerned.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I recall, Blogger doesn’t support the Trackbacks standard. Which makes it a poorer platform as far as inter-blog discussions are concerned.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: charles palma</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2009/blogs/eatin%e2%80%99s-cheatin%e2%80%99-the-backtype-plugin/#comment-13106</link> <dc:creator>charles palma</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 17:01:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/?p=862#comment-13106</guid> <description>The problem with the new plugin is that it only support Wordpress and not the high traffic... Blogger.com</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with the new plugin is that it only support WordPress and not the high traffic… Blogger.com</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ian Delaney</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2009/blogs/eatin%e2%80%99s-cheatin%e2%80%99-the-backtype-plugin/#comment-13100</link> <dc:creator>Ian Delaney</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 20:49:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/?p=862#comment-13100</guid> <description>@Tania: Go for it.
@Wadds - be interested to see any feedback you get. As I say, I am a little ambivalent in some ways.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tania: Go for it.</p><p>@Wadds — be interested to see any feedback you get. As I say, I am a little ambivalent in some ways.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tania</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2009/blogs/eatin%e2%80%99s-cheatin%e2%80%99-the-backtype-plugin/#comment-13099</link> <dc:creator>Tania</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 18:11:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/?p=862#comment-13099</guid> <description>Can i take a one small pic from your blog?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can i take a one small pic from your blog?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Stephen Waddington</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2009/blogs/eatin%e2%80%99s-cheatin%e2%80%99-the-backtype-plugin/#comment-13096</link> <dc:creator>Stephen Waddington</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 14:16:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/?p=862#comment-13096</guid> <description>Hi Ian - Thanks for this post. I&#039;ve equally grabbled with capturing conversations around a blog that are taking place in the social web. I&#039;ll install the Backtyple plug-in and report back. Cheers, Wadds</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ian — Thanks for this post. I’ve equally grabbled with capturing conversations around a blog that are taking place in the social web. I’ll install the Backtyple plug-in and report back. Cheers, Wadds</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ian Delaney</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2009/blogs/eatin%e2%80%99s-cheatin%e2%80%99-the-backtype-plugin/#comment-13068</link> <dc:creator>Ian Delaney</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 07:52:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/?p=862#comment-13068</guid> <description>Thank you, Christopher. I agree with your points - if I didn&#039;t think it was useful, I would have uninstalled the plug-in.
However, since blog measurement is necessarily comparative, it is somewhat disingenuous to suggest the playing field is still level.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Christopher. I agree with your points — if I didn’t think it was useful, I would have uninstalled the plug-in.</p><p>However, since blog measurement is necessarily comparative, it is somewhat disingenuous to suggest the playing field is still level.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Christopher Golda</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2009/blogs/eatin%e2%80%99s-cheatin%e2%80%99-the-backtype-plugin/#comment-13064</link> <dc:creator>Christopher Golda</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 22:43:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/?p=862#comment-13064</guid> <description>You&#039;ve raised some interesting points here, Ian. However, I don&#039;t think I really agree with the &quot;stealing engagement&quot; argument. Aside from the &quot;Blogs&quot; source for the plugin, all the comments we pull in are people engaging with &lt;i&gt;your&lt;/i&gt; content. If anything, people looking at the ratio of comments per post will get a clearer picture of how many people are engaged. That being said, I don&#039;t think people who measure website engagement should be looking solely at the number of comments per post, because as you said above, conversations are distributed.
Thanks!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You’ve raised some interesting points here, Ian. However, I don’t think I really agree with the “stealing engagement” argument. Aside from the “Blogs” source for the plugin, all the comments we pull in are people engaging with <i>your</i> content. If anything, people looking at the ratio of comments per post will get a clearer picture of how many people are engaged. That being said, I don’t think people who measure website engagement should be looking solely at the number of comments per post, because as you said above, conversations are distributed.</p><p>Thanks!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
