<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Surrender! Foucault and Twitter</title> <atom:link href="http://twopointouch.com/2009/business/surrender-foucault-and-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://twopointouch.com/2009/business/surrender-foucault-and-twitter/</link> <description>web 2.0, blogs and social media</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 20:58:01 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator> <item><title>By: Tweets that mention Surrender! Foucault and Twitter « twopointouch -- Topsy.com</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2009/business/surrender-foucault-and-twitter/#comment-17560</link> <dc:creator>Tweets that mention Surrender! Foucault and Twitter « twopointouch -- Topsy.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 16:49:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2009/05/27/surrender-foucault-and-twitter/#comment-17560</guid> <description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Mememory and Mememory, Kai Nörtemann. Kai Nörtemann said: interesting article about #foucault and #socialmedia http://bit.ly/cWQr6t (not the newest one, I have to admit ;-) #fb [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Mememory and Mememory, Kai Nörtemann. Kai Nörtemann said: interesting article about #foucault and #socialmedia <a
href="http://bit.ly/cWQr6t" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/cWQr6t</a> (not the newest one, I have to admit ;-) #fb […]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Foucault – the lot of you &#124; twopointouch</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2009/business/surrender-foucault-and-twitter/#comment-14132</link> <dc:creator>Foucault – the lot of you &#124; twopointouch</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 05:43:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2009/05/27/surrender-foucault-and-twitter/#comment-14132</guid> <description>[...] (location unknown, sadly) makes a great point (she made three great points, actually, but I am only doing one [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] (location unknown, sadly) makes a great point (she made three great points, actually, but I am only doing one […]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Delete, not fade away and radiate? &#171; Innovation Cloud</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2009/business/surrender-foucault-and-twitter/#comment-13652</link> <dc:creator>Delete, not fade away and radiate? &#171; Innovation Cloud</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 15:30:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2009/05/27/surrender-foucault-and-twitter/#comment-13652</guid> <description>[...] to store and always see our actions at any moment in time. My colleague Ian Delaney has written about this more eloquently than I [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] to store and always see our actions at any moment in time. My colleague Ian Delaney has written about this more eloquently than I […]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Weekly links &#124; USiT</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2009/business/surrender-foucault-and-twitter/#comment-13645</link> <dc:creator>Weekly links &#124; USiT</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 04:18:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2009/05/27/surrender-foucault-and-twitter/#comment-13645</guid> <description>[...] Delaney laments the direction in which social media may be taking [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] Delaney laments the direction in which social media may be taking […]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Fishes, Barrels &#124; berserker rage</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2009/business/surrender-foucault-and-twitter/#comment-13434</link> <dc:creator>Fishes, Barrels &#124; berserker rage</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 02:59:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2009/05/27/surrender-foucault-and-twitter/#comment-13434</guid> <description>[...] Barrels  twopointouch &#124; Surrender! Foucault and Twitter: “Creating knowledge, creating information is a form of surrender in this [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] Barrels  twopointouch | Surrender! Foucault and Twitter: “Creating knowledge, creating information is a form of surrender in this […]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: shahbaz</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2009/business/surrender-foucault-and-twitter/#comment-13423</link> <dc:creator>shahbaz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 23:50:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2009/05/27/surrender-foucault-and-twitter/#comment-13423</guid> <description>I like your basic idea of relationship between panoptican and social media, but I fear that you have missed one substantial point pertaining to this relationship. This paradox of apparent choice of opting out which is sometimes emphasised by people to differentiate this social media from panopitcan model is misplaced because of the reason that same model is first enslaving one to engage through it and when someone is not comfortable with anybody then he/she may opt out once again employing the techniques provided by same social media. Therefore, what is impotant is to highlight this dual aspect of enslavement and freedom through same model. Same social media is connecting and then it is leading us to way outs. If we donot depend on this media substantially then we would be better placed to avoid social media`s mediated way outs. But I think this sort of solution has not capacity to be an option when I am also employing one of the mode provided by this social media to express way out. This situation is paradoxical.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your basic idea of relationship between panoptican and social media, but I fear that you have missed one substantial point pertaining to this relationship. This paradox of apparent choice of opting out which is sometimes emphasised by people to differentiate this social media from panopitcan model is misplaced because of the reason that same model is first enslaving one to engage through it and when someone is not comfortable with anybody then he/she may opt out once again employing the techniques provided by same social media. Therefore, what is impotant is to highlight this dual aspect of enslavement and freedom through same model. Same social media is connecting and then it is leading us to way outs. If we donot depend on this media substantially then we would be better placed to avoid social media‘s mediated way outs. But I think this sort of solution has not capacity to be an option when I am also employing one of the mode provided by this social media to express way out. This situation is paradoxical.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Fishes, barrels &#124; simontarr.info</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2009/business/surrender-foucault-and-twitter/#comment-13371</link> <dc:creator>Fishes, barrels &#124; simontarr.info</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:26:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2009/05/27/surrender-foucault-and-twitter/#comment-13371</guid> <description>[...] twopointouch &#124; Surrender! Foucault and Twitter: &#8220;Creating knowledge, creating information is a form of surrender in this model.&#8221; [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] twopointouch | Surrender! Foucault and Twitter: “Creating knowledge, creating information is a form of surrender in this model.” […]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: adaptive path &#187; blog &#187; Adaptive Path &#187; Signposts for the Week Ending May 29</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2009/business/surrender-foucault-and-twitter/#comment-13297</link> <dc:creator>adaptive path &#187; blog &#187; Adaptive Path &#187; Signposts for the Week Ending May 29</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 00:54:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2009/05/27/surrender-foucault-and-twitter/#comment-13297</guid> <description>[...] Ian Delaney: Surrender! Foucault and Twitter. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] Ian Delaney: Surrender! Foucault and Twitter. […]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ian Delaney</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2009/business/surrender-foucault-and-twitter/#comment-13278</link> <dc:creator>Ian Delaney</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 22:10:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2009/05/27/surrender-foucault-and-twitter/#comment-13278</guid> <description>Great reading, Simon. What are my best bets/links for understanding Castell better than you in less than 10 minutes?
Everyone get over to:
http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2077/1989</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great reading, Simon. What are my best bets/links for understanding Castell better than you in less than 10 minutes?</p><p>Everyone get over to:<br
/> <a
href="http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2077/1989" rel="nofollow">http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2077/1989</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Simon Collister</title><link>http://twopointouch.com/2009/business/surrender-foucault-and-twitter/#comment-13277</link> <dc:creator>Simon Collister</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 21:54:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2009/05/27/surrender-foucault-and-twitter/#comment-13277</guid> <description>Oh yes,  I also meant to add that with delicious serendipity I also came across this today which looks a) relevant and b) interesting: http://bit.ly/SOrFW</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yes,  I also meant to add that with delicious serendipity I also came across this today which looks a) relevant and b) interesting: <a
href="http://bit.ly/SOrFW" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/SOrFW</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
