Should people be allowed to be anonymous online? World of Warcraft developer Blizzard seems somewhat undecided. Earlier this week, it introduced a Real ID scheme that would force people to post under their real names on its forums. Following widespread protests at this movement of goalposts — from pretty-much 12mn of the game’s 12mn subscribers — the company has today backed down on the idea.
The anonymity debate on web forums is a timeless classic. I last tackled the subject here, where I argued that being able to hide your identity is a key, important characteristic of web communications and ought t0 be protected with as great a fervour as net neutrality, if not more.
According to Blizzard CEO Mike Morhaime, in his statement announcing that the move was to be retracted, the idea was to improve the quality of interaction on the forums and make them more welcoming to new users:
Our efforts are driven 100% by the desire to find ways to make our community areas more welcoming for players and encourage more constructive conversations about our games. We will still move forward with new forum features such as conversation threading, the ability to rate posts up or down, improved search functionality, and more.
I think we all understand why a community manager might be tempted to outlaw anonymity. Web comic Penny Arcade pretty much nails it here, back in 2004:
You may also have come across Godwin’s Law:
As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one.
People are asshats on the Internet. Quite a lot of the time. As a gamer, I’m sorry to say that this is especially the case in the gaming community. By forcing people to reveal their true identity, the thinking goes, they are made to regard other people as human beings. Calling David Browne a “f**king ret**d idiot” is a bit harder than saying it to DethSlay84. Similarly, when you make that remark, as Eric Smith, rather than h8core666, you might pause to reflect that this will appear against your name in Google searches forever. [Names invented off the top of my head].
Or not. When people get upset, drunk, slighted on the Internet, then they tend to pretty-much blow caution to the wind a lot of the time. Look at any number of horrible hate campaigns on Facebook for plenty of evidence of people behaving badly despite their comments being linked to their own name. Unlike in real life, of course, the consequences don’t blow over after a week or so, though. They’re Googled — but people don’t often seem to think about that at the time. I’m not lecturing there — I have published some nasty posts right here that I later regretted. I think it’s the lag between regular social norms and the cybernetworked future: it’s just bound to happen.
I’m also bound to add that there are a lot of weird people out there. Some of whom are really unpleasant in their off-screen life, as well as on-screen. Having them able to track you down because you didn’t like the look of their Shaman’s buffs might well be a little off-putting to people. Remember, this isn’t a closed, consensual community, like your Facebook friends: it’s 12mn frothing lunatics. ;-)
Women and minorities have a pretty tough time as gamers. Take a look at this tremendous post on Metafilter for some education there. Short excerpt:
If you do post a picture (I never did) people either go nuts over how hot you are and won’t leave you alone — and the guys that perv on you treat you in a condescending way because hot=stupid; having to hear that shit addressed to other girls on Vent was really infuriating and uncomfortable — OR they make a point of constantly telling you how ugly you are and won’t leave you alone. There is no middle ground. They either want to fuck you or deride you. And it actually doesn’t matter how hot or how ugly you are, either; the hottest girls will get called ugly (and FAT, ALWAYS FAT), and the ugliest girls still have to deal with lonely guys who aren’t superficial. Any time the girl posts something thereafter, people will comment on her appearance, even though it has nothing to do with whatever is being discussed.
Now go read the rest.
Anonymity gives a lot of people a freedom they would not otherwise have on the Net. That’s worth something, isn’t it?
Finally, I so loved this in the RPS wrapup on the issue, despite the fact that it undermines my whole argument:
Plus the obligatory Downfall skit (totally inpenetrable to non-gamers, I suspect):























Recent Comments