![]()
Somehow this sort of thing, which I see everywhere, doesn’t entirely work for me. Maybe I’m fussy.
This is a guide to creating great newsletters. In it, we’ll explain how to create great newsletters. So if you want to create great newsletters, join us as we explain all about creating newsletters, that are great.
…Thanks for taking the time to read our guide to creating great newsletters and be sure to look out for more guides to great content soon.
So what’s the plan with these sorts of sites? I can see how they can (and do) climb to the top of Google. But you’d only visit them once, wouldn’t you? I guess there’s three possibilities:
- They run adwords-style advertising and guess that “readers”, having been lured in, will click on anything, even an adwords banner to get out again. Since they cost nothing to make, pumping out a few dozen could potential result in incomes of ermm… pennies.
- They’re desperate to ‘win’ on particular keywords. The only way their boss/client measures the success of the site is in page impressions and search position.
- They went on a really bad course about SEO. I think this is more common than you might think: I read this sort of keyword-infatuated garbage on a lot of sites that genuinely well-meaning.
But I suppose it doesn’t really matter whether I like it or not, or whether it really works, because the content farms and idiots are already winning. Conducting a search for product advice is likely to yield dozens of rubbish reviews on the first page. The web starts closing down again, whereby learning the name of a decent source of information becomes a matter of word-of-mouth. Thank goodness, we now have the social web etc. to help us find those things. It’s something I’ve historically been a great fan of, and still am, theoretically. But, when push comes to shove, and I want to know which telly to buy, it becomes very clear how basic those things still are.
image credit: freezelight






















Recent Comments